Cranberry juice cocktail, bottled, low calorie, with calcium, saccharin and corn sweetener vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cranberry juice cocktail, bottled, low calorie, with calcium, saccharin and corn sweetener
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Cranberry juice cocktail, bottled, low calorie, with calcium, saccharin and corn sweetener | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 19 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 84% more |
| Protein | 0.02 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Carbs | 4.6 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 78% more |
| Fat | 0.01 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 99% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 4.59 g | 0.87 g ★ | Cranberry juice cocktail, bottled, low calorie, with calcium, saccharin and corn sweetener has 428% more |
| Sodium | 3 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 57% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Iron | 0.04 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 97% more |
| Vitamin C | 32.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Cranberry juice cocktail, bottled, low calorie, with calcium, saccharin and corn sweetener has 0% more |
| Potassium | 25 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 85% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.