Cranberry, low bush or lingenberry, raw (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Cranberry, low bush or lingenberry, raw (Alaska Native)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Cranberry, low bush or lingenberry, raw (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 91% more |
| Carbs | 12.2 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 26 mg ★ | 17 mg | Cranberry, low bush or lingenberry, raw (Alaska Native) has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.4 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 73% more |
| Vitamin C | 21 mg ★ | 0 mg | Cranberry, low bush or lingenberry, raw (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.