Dutch brand loaf, chicken, pork and beef vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Dutch brand loaf, chicken, pork and beef
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Dutch brand loaf, chicken, pork and beef | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 273 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Dutch brand loaf, chicken, pork and beef has 203% more |
| Protein | 12 g ★ | 2.01 g | Dutch brand loaf, chicken, pork and beef has 497% more |
| Carbs | 3.93 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Fat | 22.91 g | 0.15 g ★ | Dutch brand loaf, chicken, pork and beef has 15173% more |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Sugar | 0.9 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Sodium | 786 mg | 36 mg ★ | Dutch brand loaf, chicken, pork and beef has 2083% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.16 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Potassium | 210 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.