Epazote, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Epazote, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Epazote, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 32 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Protein | 0.33 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Carbs | 7.44 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Fat | 0.52 g | 0.15 g ★ | Epazote, raw has 247% more |
| Fiber | 3.8 g ★ | 3.3 g | Epazote, raw has 15% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 36 mg ★ | Epazote, raw has 19% more |
| Calcium | 275 mg ★ | 38 mg | Epazote, raw has 624% more |
| Iron | 1.88 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Epazote, raw has 172% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Potassium | 633 mg ★ | 475 mg | Epazote, raw has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.