Figs, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Figs, raw
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Figs, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 74 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Protein | 0.75 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Carbs | 19.18 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 7% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Figs, raw has 100% more |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Sugar | 16.26 g | 6.48 g ★ | Figs, raw has 151% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 35 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
| Iron | 0.37 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Potassium | 232 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.