Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 262 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 118% more |
| Protein | 23.85 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 442% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 17.81 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 828% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 83 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 1086% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 1.57 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 5% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 401 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 133% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.