Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 205 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw has 71% more |
| Protein | 18.6 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw has 323% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 13.89 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw has 623% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 90 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw has 1186% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 1.63 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw has 9% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 314 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.