Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 134 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 12% more |
| Protein | 26 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 491% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.56 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 203 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 2800% more |
| Calcium | 40 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 135% more |
| Iron | 2.28 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 53% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 558 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, cooked, dry heat has 224% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.