Fish, mackerel, king, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, king, raw
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, king, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 13% more |
| Protein | 20.28 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 361% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 4% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 158 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 2157% more |
| Calcium | 31 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 82% more |
| Iron | 1.78 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 435 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 153% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.