Fish, mackerel, king, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, king, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, king, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 17% more |
| Protein | 20.28 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 909% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 1233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 158 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 339% more |
| Calcium | 31 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Iron | 1.78 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, mackerel, king, raw has 158% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Potassium | 435 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.