Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 139 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw has 16% more |
| Protein | 19.29 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw has 338% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw has 228% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw has 743% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 0.44 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 70% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 446 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, mackerel, spanish, raw has 159% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.