Frankfurter, beef, low fat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Frankfurter, beef, low fat
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Frankfurter, beef, low fat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Frankfurter, beef, low fat has 56% more |
| Protein | 12 g ★ | 2.01 g | Frankfurter, beef, low fat has 497% more |
| Carbs | 1.6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Frankfurter, beef, low fat has 6233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.85 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Sodium | 744 mg | 36 mg ★ | Frankfurter, beef, low fat has 1967% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 1.15 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Frankfurter, beef, low fat has 67% more |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.