Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 69 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Protein | 0.72 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 84% more |
| Carbs | 18.1 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 15% more |
| Fat | 0.16 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 92% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 68% more |
| Sugar | 15.48 g | 0.87 g ★ | Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw has 1679% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Iron | 0.36 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 191 mg ★ | 172 mg | Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw has 11% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.