Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 69 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
| Protein | 0.72 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Carbs | 18.1 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Fat | 0.16 g | 0.15 g ★ | Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw has 7% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 15.48 g | 6.48 g ★ | Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw has 139% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 0.36 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Potassium | 191 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.