Ham, chopped, not canned vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ham, chopped, not canned
1 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
7 wins
| Nutrient | Ham, chopped, not canned | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 221 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 34% more |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 47% more |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 3.57 g ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 368% more |
| Sugar | 5 g | 0 g ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 0% more |
| Sodium | 1194 mg | 74 mg ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 1514% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.83 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg ★ | 256 mg | Ham, chopped, not canned has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.