Ham, chopped, not canned vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ham, chopped, not canned
1 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
7 wins
| Nutrient | Ham, chopped, not canned | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 221 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 44% more |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 5.28 g ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 216% more |
| Sugar | 5 g | 0 g ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 0% more |
| Sodium | 1194 mg | 90 mg ★ | Ham, chopped, not canned has 1227% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 0.83 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Ham, chopped, not canned has 84% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.