Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 465 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS has 417% more |
| Protein | 7.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS has 253% more |
| Carbs | 71.8 g ★ | 20.71 g | Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS has 247% more |
| Fat | 16.6 g | 0.15 g ★ | Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS has 10967% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 26.5 g | 6.48 g ★ | Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS has 309% more |
| Sodium | 357 mg | 36 mg ★ | Keebler, Keebler Chocolate Graham SELECTS has 892% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.