Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 665 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 639% more |
| Protein | 6.65 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 231% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 70.61 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 46973% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 31 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 0.98 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 82 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.