Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 243 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 170% more |
| Protein | 17.54 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 773% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 18.66 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 12340% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 64% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 1.62 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 135% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 239 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.