Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 206 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked has 129% more |
| Protein | 28.22 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked has 1304% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 9.52 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked has 6247% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked has 111% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 2.05 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked has 197% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 344 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.