Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 134 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 49% more |
| Protein | 20.29 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 909% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 3400% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 83% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 1.77 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw has 157% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 280 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.