Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 1% more |
| Protein | 21.68 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 393% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.83 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 99% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 62 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 786% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Iron | 1.52 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 2% more |
| Potassium | 346 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 101% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.