Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 586 kcal 90 kcal Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 551% more
Protein 9.72 g 2.01 g Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 384% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 60.39 g 0.15 g Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 40160% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 35 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more
Calcium 27 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more
Iron 1.39 mg 0.69 mg Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 101% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 87 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.