Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 640 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 433% more |
| Protein | 6.92 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 57% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 67.63 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 3422% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 22 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 214% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg ★ | 17 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 35% more |
| Iron | 1.14 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 23% more |
| Potassium | 51 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.