Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 305 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 154% more |
| Protein | 24.42 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 455% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 22.26 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 1059% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 46 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 557% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 17 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 41% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.