Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 305 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 239% more |
| Protein | 24.42 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 1115% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 22.26 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 14740% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 46 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 28% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 204% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.