Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 277 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 131% more |
| Protein | 16.74 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 280% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 22.74 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 1084% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 39 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 457% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 24% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Equal |
| Potassium | 136 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.