Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 277 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 208% more |
| Protein | 16.74 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 733% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 22.74 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 15060% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 39 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 8% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 116% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 136 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.