Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 105% more |
| Protein | 24.81 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 464% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 15.56 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 710% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 514% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 41% more |
| Potassium | 167 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 3% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.