Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 193 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw has 114% more |
| Protein | 20.33 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw has 911% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 12.41 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw has 8173% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 57 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw has 58% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 1.04 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, ground lamb, raw has 51% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 281 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.