Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw has 17% more |
| Protein | 18.09 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw has 800% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.68 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw has 2353% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 94 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw has 161% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 3.29 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, heart, raw has 377% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 277 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.