Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 27% more |
| Protein | 18.39 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 39% more |
| Carbs | 0.73 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 12.12 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 483% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 23% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 44% more |
| Iron | 1.34 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 89% more |
| Potassium | 299 mg ★ | 249 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.