Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 63% more |
| Protein | 32.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 639% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.37 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 284% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 72 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 929% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Iron | 2.12 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 42% more |
| Potassium | 258 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.