Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 115 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 4% more |
| Protein | 20.4 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, raw has 364% more |
| Carbs | 0.73 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 97% more |
| Fat | 3.35 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, raw has 74% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, raw has 1071% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Iron | 1.46 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 2% more |
| Potassium | 327 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, hind-shank, separable lean only, raw has 90% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.