Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked vs Spinach, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Spinach, raw
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked | Spinach, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 596 kcal | 23 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 2491% more |
| Protein | 8.53 g ★ | 2.86 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 198% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.63 g ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Fat | 62.44 g | 0.39 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 15910% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.42 g | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 52 mg ★ | 79 mg | Spinach, raw has 34% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 99 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 94% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg | 2.71 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 49% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 28.1 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 198 mg | 558 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.