Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 596 kcal 90 kcal Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 562% more
Protein 8.53 g 2.01 g Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 324% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 62.44 g 0.15 g Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 41527% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 52 mg 36 mg Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 44% more
Calcium 6 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more
Iron 1.39 mg 0.69 mg Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 101% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 198 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.