Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 640 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 949% more |
| Protein | 4.63 g ★ | 3.15 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 47% more |
| Carbs | 1.26 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 74% more |
| Fat | 68.53 g | 3.25 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 2009% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 34 mg ★ | 43 mg | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 21% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 96% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 2300% more |
| Potassium | 119 mg | 132 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 10% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.