Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 640 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 611% more |
| Protein | 4.63 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 130% more |
| Carbs | 1.26 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Fat | 68.53 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 45587% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 34 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 119 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.