Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried vs Quinoa, cooked

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
Nutrient Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried Quinoa, cooked Difference
Calories 212 kcal 120 kcal Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried has 77% more
Protein 24.26 g 4.4 g Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried has 451% more
Carbs 0.04 g 21.3 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Fat 12.76 g 1.92 g Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried has 565% more
Fiber 0 g 2.8 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 0.87 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Sodium 65 mg 7 mg Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried has 829% more
Calcium 10 mg 17 mg Quinoa, cooked has 41% more
Iron 1.93 mg 1.49 mg Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried has 30% more
Potassium 353 mg 172 mg Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast fried has 105% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.