Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 192 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 60% more |
| Protein | 25.08 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 470% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 10.13 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 428% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 80 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 1043% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Iron | 1.47 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 1% more |
| Potassium | 334 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, square-cut shoulder, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 94% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.