Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 674 kcal | 246 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 174% more |
| Protein | 5.24 g | 24.04 g ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 78% more |
| Carbs | 0.62 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 0% more |
| Fat | 72.28 g | 15.94 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 353% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg ★ | 83 mg | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 48% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 26 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 77% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 2.59 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 73% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 51% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.