Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
5 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 674 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 418% more |
| Protein | 5.24 g ★ | 2.69 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 95% more |
| Carbs | 0.62 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 98% more |
| Fat | 72.28 g | 0.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 25714% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.05 g | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg ★ | 382 mg | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 10 mg ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 40% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 250% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg ★ | 35 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 369% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.