Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 703 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 1052% more |
| Protein | 3.87 g ★ | 3.15 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 23% more |
| Carbs | 0.55 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 89% more |
| Fat | 76.16 g | 3.25 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 2243% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg ★ | 43 mg | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 35% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 97% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 1467% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 132 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.