Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Nuts, almonds
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
1 wins
🏆
Nuts, almonds
9 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Nuts, almonds | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 703 kcal | 579 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 21% more |
| Protein | 3.87 g | 21.15 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 82% more |
| Carbs | 0.55 g | 21.55 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 97% more |
| Fat | 76.16 g | 49.93 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 53% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 12.5 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 4.35 g | Nuts, almonds has 100% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg | 1 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 2700% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 269 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 99% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 3.71 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 87% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 733 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 87% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.