Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 703 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 681% more |
| Protein | 3.87 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 93% more |
| Carbs | 0.55 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Fat | 76.16 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 50673% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.