Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 120 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Equal |
| Protein | 20.43 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw has 364% more |
| Carbs | 0.01 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.22 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw has 120% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 49 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw has 600% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Iron | 1.62 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw has 9% more |
| Potassium | 379 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean and fat, raw has 120% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.