Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 155 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried has 29% more |
| Protein | 27.94 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried has 535% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.81 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried has 151% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried has 743% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Iron | 2.12 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried has 42% more |
| Potassium | 433 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, cooked, fast fried has 152% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.