Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 3% more |
| Protein | 20.53 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw has 367% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.81 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw has 98% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 49 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw has 600% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Iron | 1.63 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw has 9% more |
| Potassium | 381 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tenderloin, separable lean only, raw has 122% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.