Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried has 4% more |
| Protein | 21.01 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried has 378% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.56 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried has 138% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 118 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried has 1586% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Iron | 1.69 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried has 13% more |
| Potassium | 265 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, cooked, soaked and fried has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.