Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 68 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Protein | 11.4 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 159% more |
| Carbs | 0.14 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 99% more |
| Fat | 2.38 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 24% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 119 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 1600% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Iron | 1.14 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 23% more |
| Potassium | 265 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.